Healthcare worker safety program in a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) alternate care site: The Javits New York Medical Station experience.

OBJECTIVE: In March 2020, New York City became the epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States. Because healthcare facilities were overwhelmed with patients, the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center was transformed into the nation's largest alternate care site: Javits New York Medical Station (hereafter termed Javits). Protecting healthcare workers (HCWs) during a global shortage of personal protective equipment (PPE) in a nontraditional healthcare setting posed unique challenges. We describe components of the HCW safety program implemented at Javits. SETTING: Javits, a large convention center transformed into a field hospital, with clinical staff from the US Public Health Service Commissioned Corps and the US Department of Defense. METHODS: Key strategies to ensure HCW safety included ensuring 1-way flow of traffic on and off the patient floor, developing a matrix detailing PPE required for each work activity and location, PPE extended use and reuse protocols, personnel training, and monitoring adherence to PPE donning/doffing protocols when entering or exiting the patient floor. Javits staff who reported COVID-19 symptoms were immediately isolated, monitored, and offered a severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. CONCLUSIONS: A well-designed and implemented HCW safety plan can minimize the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection for HCWs. The lessons learned from operating the nation's largest COVID-19 alternate care site can be adapted to other environments during public health emergencies.

Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Postconcussive Symptom Endorsement: A Parallel Comparison Between Two Nonclinical Cohorts.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is commonly estimated based on indirect metrics such as emergency department visits and self-reporting tools. The study of postconcussive symptoms faces similar challenges because of their unspecific character and indistinct causality. In this article, we compare two nonclinical, epidemiological studies that addressed these two elements and were performed within a relatively narrow period in the state of Colorado. MATERIALS AND METHODS: De-identified datasets were obtained from a random digit-dialed survey study conducted by the Craig Hospital and a study surveying soldiers returning from deployment by Defense and Veteran Traumatic Brain Injury Center. Information pertinent to participants' demographics, a history of mTBI, and symptom endorsement was extracted and homogenized in order to establish a parallel comparison between the populations of the two studies. RESULTS: From the 1,558 (Warrior Strong, 679; Craig Hospital, 879) records selected for analysis, 43% reported a history of at least one mTBI. The prevalence was significantly higher among individuals from the Defense and Veteran Traumatic Brain Injury Center study independent of gender or race. Repetitive injuries were reported by 15% of the total combined cohort and were more prevalent among males. Symptom endorsement was significantly higher in individuals with a positive history of mTBI, but over 80% of those with a negative history of mTBI endorsed at least one of the symptoms interrogated. Significant differences were observed between the military and the civilian populations in terms of the types and frequencies of the symptoms endorsed. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of mTBI and associated symptoms identified in the two study populations is higher than that of previously reported. This suggests that not all individuals sustaining concussion seek medical care and highlights the limitations of using clinical reports to assess such estimates. The lack of appropriate mechanisms to determine symptom presence and causality remains a challenge. However, the differences observed in symptom reporting between cohorts raise questions about the nature of the symptoms, the impact on the quality of life for different individuals, and the effects on military health and force readiness.

Changes in attentional processing following neurofeedback in patients with persistent post-concussive symptoms: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) often include attention deficits, particularly orienting and executive attention. Research in other clinical populations has demonstrated that neurofeedback therapy (NFT) is effective at improving orienting and executive attention, although its effects on attentional networks in patients with PPCS are unknown. METHOD: In this single-group pilot study, we examined attention-related event-related potentials (ERPs) - N1 and P3 - and cognitive outcomes following Live Z-score training (LZT), a variant of NFT. RESULTS: No changes in early selective attention, as indexed by N1 amplitude, were observed; however, P3 amplitude, which indexes neural resource allocation, increased following LZT and returned to baseline by 3 months. Cognitive performance improved following treatment, which was sustained at 3 months. The magnitude of change in P3 and ANT performance did not differ between orienting or executive attention, suggesting LZT improved general attentional processing efficiency. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that LZT may positively affect attention globally, but does not target specific attention networks. These pilot data warrant the initiation of a clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of LZT for treating attention deficits in patients with PPCS.

Semi-Automated Neurofeedback Therapy for Persistent Postconcussive Symptoms in a Military Clinical Setting: A Feasibility Study.

INTRODUCTION: Neurofeedback therapy (NFT) has demonstrated effectiveness for reducing persistent symptoms following traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, its reliance on NFT experts for administration and high number of treatment sessions limits its use in military medicine. Here, we assess the feasibility of live Z-score training (LZT)-a variant of NFT that requires fewer treatment sessions and can be administered by nonexperts-for use in a military clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single group design feasibility study was conducted to assess acceptability, tolerance, treatment satisfaction, and change in symptoms after a 6-week LZT intervention in 38 Service Members (SMs) with persistent symptoms comorbid with or secondary to mild TBI. Acceptance and feasibility were assessed using treatment completion and patients' satisfaction with treatment. To evaluate changes in symptom status, a battery of self-report questionnaires was administered at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up to evaluate changes in psychological, neurobehavioral, sleep, pain, and headache symptoms, as well as self-efficacy in symptom management and life satisfaction. RESULTS: Participants tolerated the treatment well and reported a positive experience. Symptom improvement was observed, including depressive, neurobehavioral, and pain-related symptoms, with effects sustained at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: LZT treatment appears to be a feasible, non-pharmacological therapy amenable to SMs. Results from this pilot study promote further investigation of LZT as an intervention for SMs with persistent symptoms following TBI.

Implementation of a Generalized Vestibular Rehabilitation Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Vestibular dysfunction is common in military populations as the result of traumatic brain injury, blast exposure, and/or repetitive acoustic insult. Vestibular rehabilitation (VR) has been proven to be an effective approach in the treatment of vestibular dysfunction. VR consists of a series of exercises prescribed on the basis of individual patient needs by a vestibular trained physical therapist (PT). A generalized approach to VR in a military setting could help widen the system capacity to take care of patients with vestibular symptoms, shorten waiting times for patients without impacting the burden on PTs. The rehabilitation team at the Warrior Recovery Center on Fort Carson, Colorado, developed a generalized approach in which a series of exercises were administered to individuals with vestibular dysfunction. The implementation of this approach was evaluated for quality improvement purposes and is presented below. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We utilized a combined observational/survey approach to evaluate the patients' tolerance to a variety of exercises provocative of dizziness symptoms, their overall satisfaction with the intervention, the appropriateness of the allocated resources, and the providers' confidence with the treatment and its administration. Research staff members were present as observers in all therapy sessions during the 3-month implementation period and administered surveys to patients and clinical staff at pre-established time points. Descriptive analysis was performed to summarize observations and responses to surveys. Linear regression was utilized to evaluate if a reduction in the number of patient:provider interactions occurred over the course of the implementation period. RESULTS: A total of 25 therapy sessions took place during the implementation period. Each visit lasted an average of 56 minutes with 6 minutes allocated for set up, 45 minutes for intervention and 5 minutes for cleanup. The mean number of patients per session was 3 (Max 6, Min 1) with one staff member running the intervention 56% of the time and two staff members running the intervention 44% of the time. Exercise tolerance was at 99% and the need for one-on-one interactions between providers and patients was easily attained at a 3:1 patient:provider rate. Survey assessment demonstrated 100% patient satisfaction with the program and 100% provider confidence with treatment delivery. CONCLUSION: Generalized Vestibular Rehabilitation Treatment (GVRT) was successfully implemented at the Warrior Recovery Center at Fort Carson, Colorado. The individual exercises used during the interventions were challenging to patients yet well tolerated. Resource allocation was appropriate in terms of personnel, time, and equipment. Both the clinical staff and the patients felt comfortable with the therapy and subjectively found it to be effective. The project provided valuable information to clinical staff, administrators, and the organization.

Trajectory of Postconcussive Symptoms 12 Months After Deployment in Soldiers With and Without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Warrior Strong Study.

We analyzed data from a cohort of recently deployed soldiers from 2 US Army bases, Fort Carson and Fort Bragg (2009 to 2015). Soldiers with and without a recent history of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) on deployment were evaluated within days of return and at 3, 6, and 12 months. Those with mTBI were more likely than those without to endorse ≥1 postconcussive symptom as "severe" and/or "very severe" (47% vs. 21%, baseline; adjusted relative risk (RR) = 1.71, 95% confidence interval: 1.51, 1.93, all time points), which remained significant after adjusting for posttraumatic stress disorder (adjusted RR = 1.34, 95% confidence interval: 1.20, 1.50). Prevalence and relative risks for 3 of the most common baseline symptoms remained constant over time: sleep problems (RR = 2.19), forgetfulness (RR = 2.56), and irritability (RR = 2.73). The pattern was slightly different for headache (baseline, RR = 3.44; 12 months, RR = 3.26), due to increased prevalence of headache in those without mTBI. The prevalence of clinically relevant postconcussive symptoms remained relatively constant over 1 year of follow-up, whether or not symptoms were associated with concussion. Service members with recent mTBI reported more symptoms than those without at all time points.

Epidemiology and prognosis of mild traumatic brain injury in returning soldiers: A cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI; concussion) is common in returning service members yet limited definitive evidence exists on its prognosis. METHODS: Almost 25,000 non-medically evacuated soldiers returning from Afghanistan or Iraq to 2 military bases between 2009 and 2014 were screened for mTBI. We invited a random sample to participate in the present study, oversampling those screening positive, resulting in 557 mTBI cases and 1,010 controls, of whom 366 cases and 599 controls completed 3-month follow-up evaluations. The criterion measure of screened mTBI was the Ohio State University Traumatic Brain Injury Identification Method. Postconcussive symptoms (PCS) were measured at follow-up with the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory. Symptoms reported at a severe or very severe level were considered clinically relevant. RESULTS: About half (47%) of soldiers who had sustained an mTBI during this latest deployment reported PCS at 3-month follow-up vs 25% of controls: adjusted odds ratio 2.4 (1.8-3.2). The most commonly reported symptoms (cases vs controls) were sleep problems (30% vs 14%), forgetfulness (21% vs 9%), irritability (17% vs 8%), and headaches (15% vs 5%). mTBI cases were about twice as likely as controls to report receiving rehabilitative services and fair or poor health. Other predictors of PCS included posttraumatic stress, combat exposure, and noncephalic pain. A majority of both cases and controls reported traumatic brain injuries predating this latest deployment. CONCLUSIONS: In this nonclinical population of recently deployed soldiers, a substantial proportion of those who had sustained an mTBI were symptomatic 3 months postdeployment. Future studies need to include longer follow-up to measure symptom resolution. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01847040.

Sleep, Sleep Disorders, and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. What We Know and What We Need to Know: Findings from a National Working Group.

Disturbed sleep is one of the most common complaints following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and worsens morbidity and long-term sequelae. Further, sleep and TBI share neurophysiologic underpinnings with direct relevance to recovery from TBI. As such, disturbed sleep and clinical sleep disorders represent modifiable treatment targets to improve outcomes in TBI. This paper presents key findings from a national working group on sleep and TBI, with a specific focus on the testing and development of sleep-related therapeutic interventions for mild TBI (mTBI). First, mTBI and sleep physiology are briefly reviewed. Next, essential empirical and clinical questions and knowledge gaps are addressed. Finally, actionable recommendations are offered to guide active and efficient collaboration between academic, industry, and governmental stakeholders.